data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e758f/e758f1cd22d9c8b3481907da0ec16c10707f18c2" alt="Iridient developer vs on1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/773c8/773c85291324a4515e12aff810814a5787c5c5eb" alt="iridient developer vs on1 iridient developer vs on1"
But I gotta say I’m not completely happy with Capture One’s user interface - maybe that’s because I mainly use Fuji’s in-camera converted JPEGs (for around 90% of my work) and am therefore used to Lightroom’s interface & workflow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e8a4/3e8a48b80ba808a4350302190735b4130bb0587a" alt="iridient developer vs on1 iridient developer vs on1"
To be fair I’ve happily been using Capture One for a while now as my preferred “heavy duty” solution for large printing (A3+ & larger). 20x30 inch / A1 size enlargement you can start to actually see the “worms”:įrom my point of view it’s better - the vertical rods of the railing are now barely visible and you can see a hint of the branches in the upper left quadrant, but the it does look somewhat harsh now (also here I used my preferred settings but left out the grain to be comparable to the other images). When you enlarge the below in-camera converted JPEG to a magnification corresponding to an approx. Now here’s the thing: I think that Fuji’s proprietary CFA layout is not even fully managed by their own in-camera demosaicing algorithm (albeit becoming visible only at more extreme magnifications).
#Iridient developer vs on1 software
Demosaicing software optimized for the Bayer CFA layout (as used in Adobe’s Camera RAW converter at the heart of Lightroom & Photoshop CC) can cause trouble when applied to the X-Trans CFA layout, especially with small repetitive patterns, like foliage & brick structures Fuji has implemented a different arrangement of color filters, repeating an alternating 3 by 3 pixel pattern of 5 green, 2 red and 2 blue filters, they call “ X-Trans” (the “X” referring to the X-formed arrangement of the green photo sites)įuji claims this “X-Trans” arrangement delivers a more “film-like” rendering due to the less regular pattern and better performance than the Bayer arrangement, especially improving the micro-contrast due to the higher percentage of green pixels (55% vs. Hang on, ALL makers of digital cameras? No. Obviously the demosaicing algorithm needs to match the arrangement of the color filters, otherwize you will not get the image you saw thru the viewfinder …Īll makers of digital cameras use a so-called “ Bayer” color filter arrangement (repeating a 2 by 2 pixel pattern of 2 green, 1 red and 1 blue filters).
#Iridient developer vs on1 full
This reconstructing of the full color information from the individual pixels is called “ Demosaicing”. To allow the camera to see the world in color the sensor is overlaid by a color filter array (CFA) of red, green and blue color filters in a distinctive repetitive arrangement, allowing the camera software to recompile the light levels into color information. Simply put digital sensors are comprised of millions of photo sites (“pixels”) which measure the amount of light (number of photons) hitting them.
#Iridient developer vs on1 pro
Adobe seems to have gotten their act together!? Finally … So, you may not need to get a divorce & ditch that subscription after all (they probably ain’t gonna let no-one escape anyway … -) Anyways, at the end of the day Photoshop and Lightroom are still the global standard when it comes down to pro digital asset management & post processingīut before discussing the cure let’s first understand the problem (for those of youse new to Fuji or contemplating joining the Fuji family).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e758f/e758f1cd22d9c8b3481907da0ec16c10707f18c2" alt="Iridient developer vs on1"